"Janet" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> "Goomba" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > I_am_Tosk wrote:
>> >> In article >,
>> >> says...
>> >>> Julie Bove wrote:
>> >
>> >>> So you're okay with continued ignorance? I mean, once you learn
>> >>> something you have no problem continuing on with inaccuracies?
>> >>> You probably think "high tea" is some fancy repast too, eh?
>> >>
>> >> Maybe the ignorant ones are the one percent of the population who
>> >> think
>> >> it matters so much they have to get insulting about it? If I told my
>> >> "ignorant" daughter (Masters Degree) to "come home and make me some of
>> >> that famous *Cottage Pie*", she wouldn't know what I was talking
>> >> about.
>> >> Or if I said the same to my "ignorant" mom (VP of one of the largest
>> >> banks in the state at age 30), she would probably tell me to put my
>> >> pinky
>> >> back on the cup, and stop being so difficult. Anyway, just mentioning
>> >> "high tea" tells us, well, you know...
>> >
>> > Being ignorant of the proper name for something (the historical name of
>> > this classic British dish) is not the same thing as being stupid.
>> > Once you've learned something, you're not ignorant of the fact any
>> > longer.
>> > Once I learned that the proper names for the 2 dishes, I used them. I'm
>> > a
>> > traditionalist, shoot me.
>> > What you personally decide to do with the knowledge might make you
>> > appear
>> > stupid though, y'know?
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottage_pie
>>
>> Who's the ignorant one now?
>
> Still you, as usual.
>
> Especially since you already posted "Yes, I know Wikipedia is not
> necessarily considered to be an expert. I could look elsewhere. But
> I'm not gonna."

Oh there are plenty of other cites that back that up. And as the other
poster said, it has been looked into.