On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:01:30 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
> wrote:

>In article >,
> Chemiker > wrote:
>
>> Is it easier to cook for 8? or 2? For those who've made the transition
>> from one to the other, what were the most difficult adjustments you
>> had to make?
>>
>> Looks like this old dog is going to have to learn a few new tricks.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Alex, practicing "Woof!" and rolling over.
>
>I learned to cook for two with Betty Crocker's Dinner for Two Cookbook.
>I don't think it is especially difficult to cook for two. Cooking for 8
>is more expensive. :-) "-)

Actually cooking for eight is less expensive than cooking for two per
serving. . . economies of volume.