On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:30:49 -0600, Chemiker wrote:


> Is it easier to cook for 8? or 2? For those who've made the transition
> from one to the other, what were the most difficult adjustments you
> had to make?

It's not much less trouble to cook for 2 rather than 6. I still
buy in bulk, I just freeze more from the get go. The eception is
things like last night pork butt roast. That you cook all at once
and use the remainders for tacos, quesadillas, pork in gravy, etc..
It's always easy to use leftover pork roast and other meats.

I don't know if could easier to cook for 8 rather than 2. But it's
certainly not 4 times as hard. It's more like 20% harder to cook
for 8 rather than 2. But serving for serving and time wise, it's
less expensive.

-sw