holy.....
atec77 > wrote:
>On 28/10/2010 1:49 PM, Bruce Morgen wrote:
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 28/10/2010 9:45 AM, Bruce Morgen wrote:
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 28/10/2010 9:29 AM, Bruce Morgen wrote:
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 28/10/2010 8:17 AM, Bruce Morgen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What do you call Peter Lucas?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> White trash, down-under chapter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Now* I'm LOL. :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what do you call a person who replies to a very stupid and transparent
>>>>>>> troll ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Momentarily offended and
>>>>>> harmlessly venting. Thanks
>>>>>> for asking.
>>>>>>
>>>>> incorrect bwucie
>>>>
>>>> That's not for you to
>>>> say, meddling ****. :-)
>>>>
>>> of course it is sport , now go lift something heavy so you are not
>>> quite so light in the loafers
>>
>> I suspect that was a putdown
>> humor attempt,
> a very accurate one at hat
> but it was so
>> fecklessly inept it was
>> impossible to tell for sure
>> -- sort of like a mosquito
>> bite that's so weak that it
>> tickles instead of itching.
>
> typically wrong , I bet you get the redheaded step child treatment daily
>
Are you sure you've replied
to this (silly excuse for a)
thread? Your drivel seems to
arrived from outer space and
somehow survived all that
pesky atmospheric friction.
>
>> Back to the stagnant puddle
>> with you, little bugger --
> no projecting that's impolite
>
>> come back when you can suck
>> blood instead of just plain
>> sucking at Usenet posting.
>
> not a chance
>
If you mean there's "not a
chance" of you not sucking
at Usenet posting, I
couldn't agree more.
Honestly, I don't know WTF
you're attempting to carry
on about, and I'm certain
that makes at least two
of us.
|