On Oct 22, 8:17*am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:11:36 -0400, "Ed Pawlowski"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >"Chemo the Clown" *wrote in message
> ....
>
> >"Steve LYING *******" > wrote:
> >> We're remodeling, and putting a water spray near the stove for filling up
> >> large vessels, and other times when water is needed at the stove.
>
> >> Anyone know the proper terminology for these?
>
> >> Geez...how far away is the kitchen sink? Electric stove or gas?
>
> >Amazing how your ignorance shows. *For many people with arthritis or other
> >handicap, this is a wonderful tool to assist them. *Not everyone can readily
> >lift a pot with 25# of water in it, nor can they easily *make a half dozen
> >trips filling a pitcher.
>
> >To answer the other inevitable question, no, the pot does not always have to
> >be emptied back into the sink. *If it becomes soup, it is taken out is
> >smaller batches. *If it is pasta water, I'm home by the time my wife needs
> >it emptied so it is not a problem. Anyway, solving 50% of a problem is
> >better than ignoring it.
>
> >If someone finds a pot filler useful, good for them, and I hope they enjoy
> >using it for many more years.
>
> This entire discussion has devolved into pure silliness. * In a home
> kitchen it is quite simple to attach one of those coiling plant
> watering tubes, the darn things can reach some 50 feet if necessary
> and are very inexpensive. *But one with a handicap that prevents
> handling certain kitchen chores simply wouldn't without the assistance
> of others. *Besides, building codes, fire codes, and home insurance
> policies would prevent a pot filler at the stove in a residential
> kitchen. *This Steve ******* is a lying bag of shit.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Building, fire and other codes easily allow pot filler faucets at the
stove. If they didn't, there wouldn't be any available for home
use. Which there are.

N.