On Aug 16, 5:01*am, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:10:30 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby wrote:
> > On Aug 15, 6:35*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:12:49 -0500, Mike Beede wrote:
> >>> Apparently Spam is not one of the dangerous foods.
>
> >> Anything that starts off with scare tactics and phrases like:
>
> >> "Receive these FREE reports just for subscribing"
>
> >> ...is total bullshit. *And here Amanda wanted us to think she was smart yet
> >> she can't see through these simple scam artists?
>
> >> It at least appears he makes up all this stuff himself rather than stealing
> >> it from some other kook source. *So you have to give him some credit..
>
> > Instead of beingn abitch, why can't you make some constructive
> > comment?
>
> As someone else pointed out, you demand that we comment on it,
> yet all you do it post a link without your comments.

I wasthe one asking for comment aftre someone I know saying that spciy
food is BAD for digestive track. Why do I need to give my comment.
>
> It's called spam. *And kook spam at that. *And I gave you my comments..

Since your comment was not constructive, it is not considered
comment.