"Vincent Vega" > wrote in
:
>
> Im not playing semantics here. I am just sharing my first
hand
> experience. My point, which you seem to be missing, is that
judges
> seem capable of determining if a wine is "flawed" or "not
flawed",,
> any scoring about "not flawed" is totally subjective and is
determined
> by personal taste but more importantly (from a marketing
standpoint)
> by heresay, reputation, supply and demand and "who knows
who". This
> is the dark secret of the wine industry.
>
>
My pint is that the deifference between first and third in
any competiton is often narrow