The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, a cracker idiot - lied:
> On 31 May 2007 13:04:52 -0700, Rudy > wrote:
>
>> On May 31, 11:50 am, > wrote:
>>> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:kq2u53hktgjepn7dq0sr3edheqhk2esgs5@4ax .com...
>>>> On 30 May 2007 12:41:47 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>
>>>>> They have no intrinsic moral meaning until and unless
>>>>> the livestock exist.
>>>
>>>> If you think you have any clue about any of this
>>>
>>> Livestock who exist only need us to pay attention to their welfare. What
>>> benefit do you imagine your "appreciation" gives them? I'll tell you, Zero.
>>
>> Exactly right. That was a great comment you made about the welfare in
>> their lives, rather than "their lives", that merits any consideration.
>>
>> ****wit is still trying to get people to think the livestock "ought"
>> to exist, for moral reasons
>
> That's a fantasy of yours
No. It's all you're blabbering about, ****wit. "Consider their lives"
= want the livestock to exist. That's all you mean by it.
--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs
|