On Sat, 22 May 2010 00:09:14 -0500, Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> Sqwertz > wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 21:48:58 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> Sqwertz > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 05:27:29 GMT, notbob wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2010-05-21, Sqwertz > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> And The original 2-Buck Chuck (now $3).
>>>>>
>>>>> It was always $3 everywhere but CA. Is it $3 in CA, now?
>>>>
>>>> It was $1.99 in Sunnyvale, CA for all or most of the 80's.
>>>
>>> I don't give a rats ass how inexpensive Andre is babe.
>>> I LIKE it and that is all that matters. <g>
>>
>> Whoa! Down Boy!
>
> Girl. <g>
>
>>
>> Comparing it to 2-buck Chuck is a compliment. I drank it all the
>> time. I was trying to buy a bottle of it when Target carded me and
>> refused to sell it to me on January 28th(*) (I guess that was posted
>> in ba.food, not here).
>>
>> And if I knew the price of it in the 80's (before I turned 21) I
>> musty have had some interest in it.
>>
>> So, here, have a Scooby snack and chill! (they're really cheap!)
>>
>> -sw
>>
>> (*) There goes that photographic memory again.
>
> You need some Crystal Palace.<g> Or better yet, diluted Clear Springs!

<plonk> again.

You're not making much sense these days.

-sw