james wrote:
> In message >, Niel J Humphreys
> > writes >"Jimmy"
> <see@you> wrote in message ...
> > >
> > > http://pic.imagefap.com/images/full/43/313/31309508.jpg
> > >
> >
> > Looks more like Delia Smith to me
> >
> > Not safe for work folks - and not really pleasant to look at
> > anyway. The OP clearly is not aware that he can be convicted for
> > "Distribution of Obscene Material" for his little attempt as
> > trolling, an offence which carried a possible prison sentence.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints:
> > ---
>
> The new and bizarre Dangerous Pictures Act, smuggled under the
> counter of a new criminal justice act, has more and bigger tooths.
> The act depicted in the picture supplied by the OP is specially
> described and proscribed. Possible three year sentence.
>
> Home's guidelines suggest the terrible penalty of a savage caution.
>
> No of cross-posts reset.
But, of course, that's all shite anyway because:
1. It doesn't depict a women being abused and violated.
2. It's not in my possession anyway.
Now, if anyone doesn't like it I suggest they phone the Police and then
**** off and die.