On 4/7/2010 12:21 PM, dh@. wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:26:56 -0700 (PDT), tunderbar
> > wrote:
>
>> On Mar 31, 3:02 pm, > wrote:
>>> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:m6a7r5pcu1gtnd7etuc88k6g81gl7bb7s5@4ax .com...
>>>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:11:37 -0700, > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:vvj4r5t9k0poigoj1go9jp52htcofosr92@4ax .com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:34:06 -0700, > wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> <dh@.> wrote
>>>
>>>>>>>> My guess is that he pretty much only hangs out with people
>>>>>>>> who are even less "tolerant" than he is, making him feel somewhat
>>>>>>>> more free. Remember at one time he pretended to be in some way a
>>>>>>>> "new welfarist" until Goo and his other boy kicked Rupert's ass
>>>>>>>> for pretending to consider the lives of some animal(s)
>>>>>>>> somewhere....possibly even som *livestock* animal(s). But he
>>>>>>>> can't do it and you can't do it and Goo can't do it and Salt
>>>>>>>> couldn't do it....you people just can't do it.
>>>
>>>>>>> Nobody should do "it", and the reason nobody but you does is because
>>>>>>> "it"
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> self-serving bullshit.
>>>
>>>>>> It's a necessary part of evaluating whether or not it's cruel
>>>>>> TO THE ANIMALS for humans to raise them for food.
>>>
>>>>> That doesn't mean anything.
>>>
>>>> Not to those of you too purely selfish to take the animals
>>>> into consideration, but it's very significant to anyone who does
>>>> consider them.
>>>
>>> Meaningless, self-serving tripe.. patting yourself on the back for being a
>>> person who "considers" animals when all you do is eat them.
>>>
>>> What a complete joke you are.
>>
>> We don't just eat them. We keep them, feed them, fatten them up,
>
> Misnomer addicts can't afford to consider the animals lives.

You don't consider the animals' lives at all.

--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs