amandaF wrote:

> I know that there reecently was a thread on Costco but here is my
> situation which would indicate that whether getting the membership is
> worth or not based on monetary cost is not an issue: I don't have the
> luxury to eat whatever I feel like such as stuff with lots of
> calorieand little protien
<snip>
> So what I need to know is all the good stuff available at Costco when
> it comes to meat (fish) and salad packages. If their vege pacakages re
> not too big, I'd buy that too. I prefer to eat varieties and eat the
> same thing all the time. Can you share your knowledge?
>
> BTW, as far as not having energy, I don't want to spend all my
> remaining time and energy after work oncleaning (which I do all the
> time or I feel not well from dustmites and what not), grocey shopping
> or other shopping and cooking. So, please..please..please no lecture
> on how it takes only *this* many minutes to cook *that* dish, etc. I'd
> really like only useful information (useflu as in "Useful for me per
> my plan to shop and cook").

If cost is not an issue, and you're trying to conserve time and personal
energy, then you should NOT get a Costco membership. Shopping at Costco is
energy-sapping and time-consuming. You'd be better off shopping at a
good-quality grocery store. (You'd be even better off having a personal
shopper or getting groceries delivered, but I'm guessing that money isn't
THAT much of a non-issue.)

Bob