Dan Abel wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:42:29 -0800, sf wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:56:10 -0500, blake murphy
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > in any case, people could edit better (including taking care
> > > > with attributions), but it's not a major source of irritation
> > > > for me.
> > >
> > > It's a major problem for me. Obviously they have no idea who said
> > > what. If that's the case, then just cut out everything except
> > > what you're responding to.
> >
> > well, all i can say is that you're swimming against the tide, here.
>
> I'm glad you understood what was being posted. I sure didn't. It
> almost sounded like sf was saying that people should trim their posts
> so that their replies make sense.

No, she was saying that people who bottom-post frequently fail to trim,
making their posts hard to follow, so everyone should top-post instead.



Brian

--
Day 352 of the "no grouchy usenet posts" project