In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:42:29 -0800, sf wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:56:10 -0500, blake murphy
> > > wrote:

> >>in any case, people could edit better (including taking care with
> >>attributions), but it's not a major source of irritation for me.
> >
> > It's a major problem for me. Obviously they have no idea who said
> > what. If that's the case, then just cut out everything except what
> > you're responding to.
>
> well, all i can say is that you're swimming against the tide, here.

I'm glad you understood what was being posted. I sure didn't. It
almost sounded like sf was saying that people should trim their posts so
that their replies make sense.

"Sense" sounds like a good thing to me.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA