On Jan 20, 9:58*am, "Janet" > wrote:
> heyjoe wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:57:32 -0800 (PST), ImStillMags wrote:
>
> >> On Jan 19, 3:47 pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:41:12 -0800 (PST), ImStillMags
>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>> On Jan 19, 2:10 pm, Nancy2 > wrote:
> >>>>>> So, Hi. I'm hoping this board will become a favorite and a place
> >>>>>> where I can have conversations with
> >>>>>> like minded foodies.
>
> >>>>>> -Mags
>
> >>>>> It isn't a board, it's a Usenet newsgroup. Other than that, it's
> >>>>> what you see.
>
> >>>>> N.
>
> >>>> I access this 'group' through Google message boards.....it looks
> >>>> like every other Google board to me ;-)
>
> >>> RFC isn't a google group and was around long before google was even
> >>> dreamed up. Google only logs it and allows you to post to it. Get a
> >>> real reader and server and you'll see the difference. If I had to
> >>> use google I'd be gone in a flash.
>
> >>> Lou
>
> >> To each his own, Lou. * I don't mind the format.
>
> > Many people automatically kill/delete all posts from Google Groups
> > because they are an unending source of spam. *Please read and
> > understand the following web page, <http://improve-usenet.org/>, for
> > some insight into why you're not reaching as many folks in
> > rec.food.cooking as you could, if you were a responsible netizen and
> > stopped using Google Groups.
>
> It is also true that one can put a line in the beginning of posts that
> prevents Google from stealing your post....I can't remember what it
> is...something about "no archive." If anyone else knows and can post it, I'd
> appreciate it.

They steal them and then sell them into slavery. "Don't be evil,"
indeed! Young, White, female posts should ALWAYS be x-no-archived,
since those bring the most cash on the black market.

--Bryan