"veganism" isn't what it purports to be
Rupert wrote:
> On Dec 29, 3:56 pm, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Dec 29, 11:13 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 29, 10:57 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Dec 29, 2:46 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 8:49 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Ha wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ex-PFC Wintergreen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> All "vegans" start by believing a logical fallacy:
>>>>>>>>>>>> If I consume animal products, I cause animals to suffer and die.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't consume any animal products;
>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore, I don't cause any animals to suffer and die.
>>>>>>>>>>> All vegans?
>>>>>>>>>> Without exception. They all start with that, and many - probably most -
>>>>>>>>>> never move off it. Look at the myriad "vegan" web sites that extol
>>>>>>>>>> "veganism" as a means of living a "cruelty-free" or "death-free"
>>>>>>>>>> lifestyle. Those people, by necessary implication, believe in the
>>>>>>>>>> logical fallacy.
>>>>>>>>> It's probably fair to say that it is quite widespread
>>>>>>>> Universal, at the outset. Most never abandon it.
>>>>>>> See the discussion in my other post.
>>>>>> See my well established fact, above: All "vegans" begin by believing in
>>>>>> the logical fallacy, and most never abandon it.
>>>>> No, "well established fact" is not the phrase you were looking for
>>>> Indeed it is what I was looking for.
>>> Well, that's a shame
>> I don't think so.
>
> Whatever process you use for belief-formation
Logic and rational analysis.
|