"veganism" isn't what it purports to be
Rupert wrote:
> On Dec 29, 3:56 pm, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Dec 29, 10:56 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 29, 2:45 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 8:57 am, ex-PFC Wintergreen >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Ha" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>> ex-PFC Wintergreen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> All "vegans" start by believing a logical fallacy:
>>>>>>>>>>> If I consume animal products, I cause animals to suffer and die.
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't consume any animal products;
>>>>>>>>>>> therefore, I don't cause any animals to suffer and die.
>>>>>>>>>> All vegans?
>>>>>>>>>> rather a sweeping statement!
>>>>>>>>> You can replace "All vegans" with "Vegans" (in general) and not lose the
>>>>>>>>> validity of the message.
>>>>>>>>> Are you implicitly agreeing with the message but claiming to be an
>>>>>>>>> exception?
>>>>>>>> I don't have any problem making the assertion "all vegans". They do
>>>>>>>> *all* begin by believing that being "vegan" equates to living a
>>>>>>>> "cruelty-free" or "death-free" lifestyle.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>> False. I have never believed that.
>>>>>> You have.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>> Well, whatever the truth of the matter is, I would certainly know.
>>>> We both know you began by believing in the fallacy.
>>> No, I know I didn't,
>> You did.
>
> Yawn.
Not an argument; not even a claim.
|