Bob Muncie wrote:
> Roger wrote:
>> Bob Muncie wrote:
>>> Stan Horwitz wrote:
>>>> In article >,
>>>> "Dimitri" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Caller "Hello, may I speak with Mr./Mrs. X"
>>>>> You " Do you have the Personal Password?
>>>>> Caller " What Password?"
>>>>> You "The Password Necessary to speak with Mr./Mrs. X"
>>>>> Caller "No but Can I speak with Mr./Mrs. X"
>>>>> You "I'm sorry I am their Personal assistant and without
>>>>> the proper password I can't put your call through"
>>>>> You "Good By and thanks for calling"
>>>>>
>>>>> Works every time.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Even better is to ignore such phone calls by never picking up the
>>>> phone. Caller-ID helps tremendously with that.
>>>
>>> I would use your logic Stan if that were an option.
>>>
>>> No caller ID available where I am.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>
>> Evidently there isn't much else available where you are. Your posting
>> history in the last 24 hours has been nearly nonstop. Pathetic
>> doesn't quite do it.
>

Let's review...

> I guess you speak for yourself, and your own qualities... don't you?
>

No, I was speaking of your near 24/7 posting in the last day, or so.

> I don't pattern anyone, and yet seem to post on topic much of the time..
> do you?
>

What the hell does that mean? (1) I never said *anything* about a
"pattern". And (2) you said you would never post OT again - yet you
still do - often.

> OT: Even if I could use caller ID, I'm not sure I wouldn't have more fun
> with Stan's approach.
>

I didn't comment on that at all.

> Bob

You don't present yourself as a very sharp individual. You might want
to review your posts before you hit the "send" button.