Michel Boucher wrote:

> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in
> :
>
>>> This has nothing to do with your weewee and all to do with their
>>> refusal to
>>> abide by regulations in areas in which they "operate". Obviously,
>>> they believe themselves to be above the law, which is the first sign
>>> of a general malaise in the insurance scam biz.
>>
>> If in violation of some law, they should do it. OTOH, as a corporate
>> policy, I'd be against it. Should they also provide hookers for
>> those unable to meet hot women?
>
> But we're not discussing the act of sexual congress, merely the
> acquisition of a drug as sanctioned by the local authorities. Once
> insurance companies start denying Viagra where they are obliged to
> provide it, it's a slippery slope to denying services to the mentally
> deficient, the elderly, etc.
>
> Too bad no one has identified conservatism as a pre-existing
> condition that would disqualify sufferers from cold remedies, or some
> such thing.
>
> If anyone has a plan to "kill grandma", it has to be the current
> slate of insurance companies.


Yep, those fearesome "death panels" *already* exist here in the states, they
are called "insurance companies"...

This is something that Obama and the Dems *should* be mentioning in the
current health care debate, but Obama's *first* action in proposing his
health care "plan" <cough>
was to strike a sweetheart deal with the insurance lobby...I mean WHERE do
you think those politicans (of both stripes) get the rubles to fund their
political campaigns...???

Still *another* reason to disdain his fraudulent "audacity of hope"
shtick...

What he did in giving away the country to Wall Street interests *pales*
besided the financial shenanigans of the Bush administration, and this
health care scam of his is still another example. The level of Obama's
complicity in all of this is heinous, in fact there is not a even a word
extant to describe it...


--
Best
Greg



--
Best
Greg