"Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
. ..
> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in
> :
>
>>> This has nothing to do with your weewee and all to do with their
>>> refusal to
>>> abide by regulations in areas in which they "operate". Obviously,
>>> they believe themselves to be above the law, which is the first sign
>>> of a general malaise in the insurance scam biz.
>>
>> If in violation of some law, they should do it. OTOH, as a corporate
>> policy, I'd be against it. Should they also provide hookers for those
>> unable to meet hot women?
>
> But we're not discussing the act of sexual congress, merely the
> acquisition
> of a drug as sanctioned by the local authorities. Once insurance
> companies
> start denying Viagra where they are obliged to provide it, it's a slippery
> slope to denying services to the mentally deficient, the elderly, etc.
>
> Too bad no one has identified conservatism as a pre-existing condition
> that
> would disqualify sufferers from cold remedies, or some such thing.
>
> If anyone has a plan to "kill grandma", it has to be the current slate of
> insurance companies.

In UK we are currently teetering on the edge of that particular
abyss..........