On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 15:21:09 -0500, "K3" >
wrote:

>
>"zenit" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:53:57 -0000 (GMT),
>> "Mr. Robocheese" >
>> had to open a new box of zerones to say
>>
>> >Fudge wrote:
>> >
>> >> There it was on The CBS News with Dan. In prime time, a man shoots his
>> >> lawyer. BANG, the lawyer ducked. BANG, the lawyer cringed behind a
>tree.
>> >> BANG BANG BANG. Hooray! Oh Joy, what a delight. Thank you Ja! There is
>> >> universal justice. From L.A. to Boston squeals of delight erupted from
>> >> millions of victims. In the oaken chambers of prestige law firm,
>nervous
>> >> counselors shook their learned heads in shock and horror. Has a new
>> >> president been set? Dissatisfied with your lawyer? Shoot he *******!
>Anyone
>> >> have an AVI file of this memorable moment?
>> >>
>> >> Farmer John
>> >
>> > He did not kill the guy. With all those bullits. He is as good of a
>> >shooter, as the guy is a lawyer. They deserve each other.
>> >
>> > But I bet it did send a message.
>> >
>> > Mr. Robocheese
>>
>> Yeah, it did... The message is that this country has its fair share of
>> armed nut-cases... The shooter was lucky a LEO didn't put him down
>> permanently...
>>
>> I hope they give the pea-brain at least 10 years... He's 63 now, and
>> that'll keep him on ice well into his "golden" years... That's the
>> message that needs to be sent; shoot someone, go to prison...
>>
>> I'm owned guns for over 50 years and hold a lifetime membership in the
>> NRA, but when I see insane behavior like that displayed by that idiot
>> who assaulted an unarmed person with a handgun, I can see where the
>> anti-gun activists have an arguable point...
>>
>> <! -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- >
>> zenit
>
>I'm sorry to disagree, but IMHO every lawyer is "armed"... holding others
>lives in their hands... some (many?) guilty... some (many?) innocent... not
>just the accussed, but also the lawyers themselves!!!

>I'm not saying that the shooting was right/wrong...

I don't understand- what are you disagreeing with in your previous
paragraph?

> I'm just saying that
>I've known innocent people who have been sentenced to life (death?) due to
>poor representation from crummy lawyers.

This incident was over money.

Sue(tm)
Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!