"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:21:50 -0500, Sky wrote:
>
>> brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>> "Sky" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> X-posted with followups set to 'rec.food.equipment'
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DISCLAIMER!! I'm only a consumer who's interested to learn if
>>>> this
>>>> peeler is worthwhile or not!
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone else seen the recent (USA) "TV info/commercial" for
>>>> the
>>>> "titan peeler" -- the 'dot com' is the same as its name if anyone
>>>> who
>>>> might be interested. (snipperoonies
>>>>
>>>> Will someone please play 'devil's advocate' <G>. Do I really
>>>> need
>>>> another veggie peeler?? It's not like I peel a lot of veggies,
>>>> after
>>>> all <hehehehe>! And I have three of those 'ancient' peelers from
>>>> 30+++++........ years ago =
>>>>
>>>> Sky, who's doing enough arm-twisting on her own, eh???
>>
>>
>>> Since 1941 this has been the best peeler on the planet... be sure
>>> to get the
>>> one with the *tempered steel blade*... peelers with stainless
>>> steel blades
>>> suck.
>>> http://www.shopworldkitchen.com/inde...pc=70950000306
>>
>> That's the type/brand of peeler I already have - and three at that
>>
>>
>> Sky
>
> if you were peeling fifty pounds of potatoes you might want
> something
> easier on the hand, but other than that they're hard to beat.
>
> your pal,
> blake

If you were peeling 50 lb of potatoes you would want one of those
abrasive drum things we used in the mess hall at fort knox.

del