On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:28:04 +0000 (UTC), Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>>On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:19:53 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:33:28 -0400, "cybercat" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do you admire this kind of petty nitpicking semantics game? As though there
>>>>are no stupid laws. I don't give a fat, selfish, smug suburbanite's ass WHAT
>>>>the law is, it is utterly petty and miserably small and uncaring to begrudge
>>>>the poor or needy your refuse. And yes you bet I am talking about YOU, sf.
>
>>> It's not a game of semantics and I live in a city not suburbs. It's
>>> the law and you know it by this time. If the bins were on my
>>> property, they would be trespassing while they steal, but I am forced
>>> to put them on the sidewalk for pick up. Bins on the sidewalk doesn't
>>> mean it's open season to rummage.
>>>
>>> Wrap yourself up in the flag and sing *** bi ya, but you won't change
>>> my mind. It's stealing. They are stealing from me and the company I
>>> have a contract with. Wear your halo with pride - I will happily
>>> redirect anyone who wants to pick recyclables out of my bin over to
>>> your house.
>>
>>i'm telling you, armed guards are the only answer.
>
> Heeeeeeeey, now that's an idea.
>
> sf could be the darling of redstate and freerepublic. She'd get a
> lot of attention (positive for a change, LOL) as the brave,
> plucky person standing up for "property rights" or whatever in Leftyland
> USA and nobody would ask her picky questions about "so, how does having a truck
> or two bags and a pole imply that all food, housing, and income needs are
> taken care of?". She could bask in the limelight and wallow in the hate.
>
<snort>

your pal,
blake