On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:43:14 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:

> In article >,
> ChattyCathy > wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>> > Dan Abel > wrote:
>> >
>> >> The CABAL (TINC) for this group doesn't run things quite the way your
>> >> council that runs the recreation area at the old folks home where you
>> >> live does. Thanks for the offer, though.
>> >
>> > Did you not get recent memo #65536 dated 09/04/2009?
>> >
>> > Item 71: There Is No More, "TINC". Please reference new
>> > rule TINMTINC (p. 64)
>>
>> Oh, *that* memo? I chose to ignore it; thought everybody would - as they
>> do all other memos. Guess not.
>
> Steve and I are from the US. That means that 09/04/2009 translates to
> the fourth day of September of the year 2009. In other words, the memo
> hasn't taken effect yet.
>
> :-)

<g> Shoulda spotted that... I keep forgetting that the US has it's
day/month format front-to-back, um, I mean back-to-front. That's why we
should all stick to the yyyy-mm-dd like most well behaved mainframes and
computers do...
>
> Once we reach that date, of course, I will *then* proceed to ignore it.
>
> :-)

<laugh> As well you should.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy