OT 13 dead
blake murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:58:02 -0600, Omelet wrote:
>
>> In article
>> >,
>> maxine > wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 3, 3:36 pm, Omelet > wrote:
>>>> In article >,
>>>>
>>>> "Dimitri" > wrote:
>>>>> :-(
>>>>> 13 Dead in New York Shooting
>>>>> BINGHAMTON, NY (AP) -- A gunman entered an immigration services center in
>>>>> downtown Binghamton on Friday, killing 13 and injuring others.
>>>>> Dimitri
>>>> This is why the victims needed to be ARMED. The ability to shoot back
>>>> may have minimized the number of victims.
>>>>
>>>> New York has draconian anti-gun laws and as you can see, those don't
>>>> stop criminals that don't obey laws.
>>> In a situation like that, the best you could hope for would be someone
>>> quick enough to take out the gunman before he ran out of ammo. But
>>> the other six folks who pull out their piece and miss the gunman may
>>> end up hitting some other innocents.
>> That's always the worry of those that don't agree with this concept.
>>
>>> We will have to agree to disagree on this topic, Om. Where food is
>>> concerned, caring for relatives, or health, we can find more common
>>> ground.
>>>
>>> Maxine
>> It's all good. :-) I'm not a militant pro-RKBA'er.
>> We can agree to disagree!
>>
>> What would you suggest as the solution to this problem?
>
> gosh, how about we only let the police and army have guns?
>
> blake
You mean like in Mexico?
|