On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:17:49 -0400, Dave Smith wrote:

> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
>
>>
>> Personally I'm all for them having the ability to park in a disabled
>> slot. I'm not for reserving slots for "expectant mothers". I'm probably
>> one of the posters you are disgusted with. When a person chooses to
>> carry a child to full term I feel they should be ready for the
>> responsibilities and possible issues that might arise from that choice.
>> If a pregnancy is difficult some type of alternate plan could be worked
>> out. I think part of my opinion is based upon the "entitlement"
>> attitude some people have regarding procreation and the resulting
>> offspring. I'm in no way implying you are/were such a person it's just
>> an opinion.
>
> Reproduction is a natural behaviour, and essential to our continued
> existence. While is may or may not be seen as voluntary, so can extreme
> obesity. There are a lot of people around who are just to fat to move
> because they stuff themselves with food on a daily basis. We consider
> them to be disabled and offer special parking, so I don't understand the
> objection to offering the same to a person who is having physical
> problems in relation to their bringing a new life into the world.

they got fat parking spaces now? i can see a problem with kicking anoretic
women out of them.

your pal,
blake