|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|
|
OT--MS Vista
notbob wrote:
> On 2009-03-26, T > wrote:
>> In article >,
>
>>> Quite so. And NoScript is another one, in my book.....
>
>> Another good one is FlashBlock.
>
> NoScript is infinitely superior. Flashblock primarily blocks Flash scripts.
> NoScript blocks ALL scripts, whether they be server-side or client-side
> scripts, and there are hundreds. Java, php, cgi, asp, blah blah....
>
> The downside to NoScript is you also can't do any sort of online activities
> without a lot of hassles like individual script control. Online banking is
> a good example. I do online banking, but only with a really locked down
> user acct with cookies, firewall, and scripts tightly controlled. It's
> worth the hassle.
>
> nb
for a bit of depth of why people should do as you do. see
http://www.tinyurl.com/43kjvz
|