On Mar 25, 11:22*am, dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:39:01 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" > wrote:
> >On Mar 24, 10:50*am, dh@. wrote:
> >> "The opportunity for potential livestock to "get to
> >> experience life" deserves *NO* moral consideration
> >> whatever" - Goo
>
> >> "I give the lives of animals that exist *LOTS*
> >> of consideration." - Goo
>
> >> "the "getting to experience life" deserves NO
> >> moral consideration, and is given none" - Goo
>
> >> "I also give the not-yet-begun lives of animals
> >> that are "in the pipeline", so to speak, a lot of
> >> consideration" - Goo
>
> >> "There is no "consideration" to be given." - Goo
>
> >> "Life is not a benefit for farm animals." - Goo
>
> >> "Their lives may be pleasant for them." - Goo
>
> >> ""Life", by which you mean coming into existence, is not
> >> a benefit at all" - Goo
>
> >> "We ARE NOT, and NEVER WERE, talking about whether
> >> existing animals "benefit" from living." - Goo
>
> >> "Those "lives of positive value" are only meaningful
> >> *IF* the livestock exist. " - Goo
>
> >> "The topic is not and never has been whether or not
> >> existing animals enjoy living." - Goo
>
> >> "IF they exist, then they can benefit (or not) from the
> >> aspects of their lives." - Goo
>
> >> "No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo
>
> >> "We are not and never were talking about benefits for
> >> existing entities" - Goo
>
> >> "Coming into existence is not a benefit to them" - Goo
>
> >> "Set your clock back by an hour" - Goo
>
> >> "I didn't say to set your clock back an hour" - Goo
>
> >> "When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the
> >> existence we know" - Goo
>
> >> "I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"" - Goo
>
> >> "we don't know if that move improves its welfare" - Goo
>
> >> "the deliberate killing of animals for use by humans DOES
> >> deserve moral consideration, and gets it." - Goo
>
> >> "Intent doesn't matter" - Goo
>
> >> "ONLY deliberate human killing deserves any moral
> >> consideration." - Goo
>
> >"Set your clock back by an hour" - Goo
>
> >"I didn't say to set your clock back an hour" - Goo
>
> >ROTFLMAO!!
>
> >Poor stupid Goo.;o)
>
> * * No one outstupids himself like that Goober. I miss
> the days when you would think you'd seen Goob be
> as stupid as a person can get, and then he'd surprise
> you with something even stupider...ah the days of Goo...-


I gave up thinking that Goo couldn't say anything stupider than his
last post because he'd always do what I thought couldn't be done: he'd
outstupid himself.

Ah,...The good old days. I wonder if the younger generation will
believe us when we regale them with stories of Goo?