Omelet wrote:
> In article >,
> Serene Vannoy > wrote:
>
>> Omelet wrote:
>>> Thought this was fun enough to pass on. :-) I'm not personally into
>> Did you notice this part?
>>
>>> 2009 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
>>> View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/132736/
>> (That is, that the work is copyrighted and shouldn't be broadcast
>> without permission, and that it's available as a link rather than a
>> lonnnng Usenet post?)
>>
>> Serene
>
> I got it via e-mail so no, I don't worry about stuff like that...
>
> <shrugs>
>
> Why do you hon'?

Because I and many of my friends make our livings selling our words, and
it's not fair to us to take something that belongs to us and ignore our
clear request that you not distribute it.

Serene

--
42 Magazine, celebrating life with meaning. Inaugural issue March '09!
http://42magazine.com

"But here's a handy hint: if your fabulous theory for ending war and
all other human conflict will not survive an online argument with
humourless feminists who are not afraid to throw rape around as an
example, your theory needs work." -- Aqua, alt.polyamory