ChattyCathy wrote:
>
> l, not -l wrote:
>
> > ChattyCathy wrote:
> >> bulka wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Checked the survey results. One other person admitted to being
> >>> bored
> >>> and argumentative. Are you the same one with a gender
> >>> identification problem?
> >>>
> >>> Just askin'.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Heh. I guess there must be a couple of hermaphrodites who read r.f.c
> >> out there...
> >
> > I have read that between 1 and 5 percent of the population is
> > transgender; given the total number of respondents to the RFC survey,
> > it seems reasonable that there might be 2 or more transgender
> > participants.
> >
>
> AFAIAA, until as such time as the necessary surgery has been done and
> completed successfully, people are either biologically (and legally)
> male or female. However, as there are (allegedly) thousands of
> participants (a.k.a lurkers) in this newsgroup, I suppose it's not
> unreasonable to assume that we might have 2 (or more) transgender
> participants.
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy


Or people such as me, who prefer to be sarcastic :P