On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:19:11 GMT, brooklyn1 wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:24:15 -0500, Andy wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz said...
>>>
>>>> Andy > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I guess the economy is picking up!
>>>>>
>>>>> So much time, so few rfc posts!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll bet I can get my old crepe chef job back.
>>>>>
>>>>> Need references!
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks good in a chef's hat, adept with a spatula, kind to customers...
>>>>> that kinda thing! ?
>>>>
>>>> There really needs to be a group for Andy all his own.
>>>> Who people encourage this drunk to post all this shit is beyond any
>>>> sense at all.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> Warts,
>>>
>>> For a fag like you, you should really mind your manners.
>>>
>>> You give Texas a bad name. And smell!
>>>
>>> Andy
>>
>> you know, andy old chum, calling someone a fag and thinking it an insult
>> is
>> *so* very junior-high school. grow the **** up.
>>
>> on top of that,
>>
>>> For a fag like you, you should really mind your manners.
>>
>> doesn't even make any sense.
>>
>>
> Sure it makes sense... Andy wasn't being insulting... he was merely
> reminding the sqwartz via constructive criticism that good fags are refined,
> mannerly, and hospitible...

nope. his intent may be clear, but his syntax is garbled, just like yours
usually is.

>and anyway, the sqwartz is obviously asexual.
> What's wrong with a homo saying they're a fag, it's better than saying
> they're ***... where the **** did this *** thingie come from... *** is like
> stupid, it's like the emporer's new clothes story, be a man for gosh sakes,
> stand up tall and proud and say what you are, you're a fag, a fruit is
> better, but ***, *** is like queer, oy ***!

like the above. what the **** is this supposed to mean?

what a tangled, cobwebby, nasty thing your mind is.

blake