notbob wrote:
> On 2009-03-08, ChattyCathy > wrote:
>> I have taken the liberty of putting up a survey about this on the RFC
>> site. Of course there are no 'maybes' or 'MCINLs' in this one.
>
> Forget the old rfc cookbook. It's everywhere. If a recipe is good enough,
> it's already gone to general web circulation. If we wanna argue/discuss
> something, lets discuss a 2nd book. I think an rfc pdf cookbook is an
> excellent idea. This is a free and open newsgroup. There's no reason why a
> 2nd cookbook shouldn't be, also.
>
> nb

Well, if there is to be a second rfc cookbook, I would still vote
for a hard copy and not a pdf file.

--
Jean B.