On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:00:03 GMT, brooklyn1 wrote:
> "Dan Abel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article
>> >,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 8, 1:13 pm, ChattyCathy > wrote:
>>> > brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >>> All those who contributed contents, that's who... no others have
>>> > >>> anything to say.
>>>
>>> He has a valid point here -- if contributors object, it shouldn't be
>>> reproduced. -aem
>>
>> But what if some contributors want it available, and some don't? Why
>> not just not post recipes for people who don't want their own recipes
>> posted?
>>
>>
> That's already been done... many people have always posted their recipes
> whenever asked, even when not asked. Anyone who is honestly interested in
> having the recipe wouldn't care that they received it individually... those
> who want the book page version have another agenda, and definitely not
> honest. Folks ought to look up the word "larceny".
yep, there's definitely money involved - big money.
<cocks eyebrow and rubs thumb and forefinger together>
blake