On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:45:27 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:23:22 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
>
>>In article >,
>> sf > wrote:
>>
>>> It seemed to be a lot of effort and I'm not interested anyway. Take
>>> what's been posted lately and store in a file on your completer. I'm
>>> sure if there are missing pages, the OP will post those. In fact, if
>>> we ask her real nice, maybe Chatty Cathy will archive it on the web
>>> site.
>>
>>Various suggestions have been made over the years. Believe it or not,
>>there has been much anguish about it posted here. I don't believe that
>>legal action was threatened, but it was pretty much that level of anger.
>>I suspect that most submissions were electronic, and that when all of
>>those people all over the world worked on standardizing the recipes,
>>that they didn't mail pieces of paper back and forth.
>
> I didn't have a dog in the fight. I was glad that I stayed out of it
> back then (due to time constraints) and I'm glad I did now (because it
> got so ugly). I wasn't privy to inner squabbles and that's a good
> thing. What over flowed into public was an embarrassment to those
> involved. Because I was not involved, I quickly forgot about the
> squabbles.
>
> Now, fill me in on Grandma - since you remember so much.

grandma's up on the roof and we can't get her down.

your pal,
blake