"brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Damn, damn, and damn! If I had remembered this, I would have asked
>>>> for a halt to the postings immediately. The group is archived all
>>>> over the internet. The PDF file, if it's made available on the RFC
>>>> site, will be mass distributed. Count on it.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if so much time has passed that it's become a non-issue
>>>> or not.
>>>>
>>>> What do people think?
>>>
>>> I have taken the liberty of putting up a survey about this on the RFC
>>> site. Of course there are no 'maybes' or 'MCINLs' in this one.
>>>>
>>>> Carol, opening a can of worms
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers
>>> Chatty Cathy
>>
>>
>> I think enough time has passed, the "statute of limitations" (so to
>> speak) has run out. Nancy isn't collecting money anymore to contribute
>> to the charity. The money was contributed, the project shut down. What
>> difference does it make now?
>>
>> Jill
>
> The statute of limitations on the copywrite still has quite a ways to go.
> The difference it makes to give away the original book is it's an affront
> to all those who labored long and hard, and then there will be absolutely
> no motivation for all the newbies to do their own stinkin' book (not that
> they could)... da moochin' BUMS! LOL
>
>
I seem to be waffling in my convictions On the one hand I think we
collected monies to help City Harvest and that was the intention of the
book, so it probably should still cost something. On the other hand, most
of the recipes were already posted here anyway. Anyone who cares to really
look (outside of Rusty's posts) could find them if they really wanted to.
<shrug>

Jill