"kilikini" > wrote:
> > wrote in message
> > DL > wrote:
> > > I generally ignore them but if it was 1943 I might act differently.
> > > Check out this reprint of an old war poster:
> > >
> http://www.archives.gov/exhibit_hall...se_it_up/image
> > > s_html/save_waste_fats.html
> > >
> > > I was highly amused by it.
> > >
> > I suppose it might seem funny now, but I was a kid during WW II.
> > Rationing and turning in newspapers, tin cans, fat, etc. wasn't funny
> > at the time.
> >
> > Meanwhile, I just nuked a Popeye's drumstick with hot sauce for a
> > snack. It was meat. Lilly liked the bones, too. The cuz will cook when
> > he finishes fixing his niece's car. Maybe she'll bring her little
> > Japanese girl friend over later (eye candy)!
> >
> The correct term would be ONE eyed candy...... maybe you can borrow her
> skirt?
>
"ONE eyed candy......"? Think about it. Now, if I borrowed her skirt, she'd
be . . . never mind.

--
Intuitive insights from Nick, Retired in the San Fernando Valley
"Giving violent criminals a government guarantee that their intended
victims are defenseless is bad public policy."
- John Ross, "Unintended Consequences"
If you can read this, thank a teacher.
If you can read it in English, THANK A VETERAN!