Serene Vannoy > wrote:

> I suspect there may be less than .5 grams in whatever a serving is on
> the label. In that case, they often round down to zero. That's how you
> end up with zero-trans-fat shortening.

Hi Serene!! (Serene was with me when I bought the fabled yam cake. )

I know that nutritional info is rounded down and you can get a 0 value
when there's actually a fractional amount of <whatever>. But from what
I've heard, konjac is very high in fiber, so I would have expected it to
have a higher amount. I suspect it was labeled incorrectly. Otherwise,
this stuff would have absolutely no nutritional value whatsoever - no
protein, no fat, no carb, no fiber, and no vitamins. I would have a hard
time calling such an object food.

--
Joyce ^..^

(To email me, remove the X's from my user name.)