Why?
On Dec 21, 10:02*am, Peter Lucas > wrote:
> Mark Thorson > wrote in news:494D76C1.566409B0
> @sonic.net:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:36:48 -0800 (PST), Peter Lucas
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >Why pick on me?
>
> >> Geeze, Louise! *The forger strikes again. *This is getting REALLY
> old.
> >> Isn't there a playground somewhere, where you could pick a fight with
> >> a little kid?
>
> > Peter exposed Kirkland as a liar and a coward.
> > Apparently, now Peter gets the "Chung" treatment,
> > except using a blizzard of fake names, unlike
> > Chung who at least posted under his own name.
>
> I never had the (dis) pleasure of seeing/hearing about this "Chung".
> Unless I saw it and killfiled it straight-away.
>
>
>
> > I suppose we'll have to wait for Peter to die
> > before Kirkland stops his smear campaign.
>
> And *that's* not going to happen (me dying) anytime soon!!
>
> kirkland will die soon. It's a chronic alcoholic, unemployed, alone, and
> divorced. Percentages are *definitely* in favour of it dying soon.
Not me then Lucas for:
I am not an alcoholic,
I am fully employed,
I live with my partner who is employed,
I am in good health.
want proof, next time you are in Melbourne drop round and see me.
Bevan Kirkland
|