On Dec 17, 1:42*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:59:20 +0000 (UTC), Jeßus
>
> > wrote:
> >Yeah, well congrats on being equally stupid as lucas.
> >'welshdog' would not impersonate lucas - that is one thing he wouldnt do,
> >that I'm sure of.
>
> Nobody accused Welshdog.
>


EXCUSE ME? *? !!

Perhaps by design or more likely accident, this post of yours may
indicate that you perceive the infamous peter lucas to be a nobody
The above notwithstanding here is a direct copy & past of how this
bun fight started


You will note how Mr Lucas has stormed in and says

that some one (as yet to be confirmed) gave him "a heads up"
He (Lucas then goes on to make the allegation that there is a
"stalker" by the name Cl etc )
Read it for your self .

Thus one may be driven to ask who is actually stalking who in this
sad affair ?

Lucas started another attention getting but very disruptive thread .
On the current chain of evidence the conclusion may be drawn that
Lucas in fact
is bringing uninvolved and disinterested parties into the fray .

Albeit with assistance from others who appear now to have the desire
to see natural justice done .
Natural Justice in this context may also have power in it's legal
definition .(in the Australian and NZ and other Commonwealth
Jurisdictions )

Although initially reluctant to continue involvement with Lucas apart
from food discourse in this place.
Mr Lucas has *again* gone beyond boundaries delineated .defined and
enacted under Australian law in this and other Newsgroups ( under
various signatures)

It is up to you SF to draw your own conclusions .
However , do so on the confirmed evidence . Evidence I might add
typed by a computer that is located at his residence.
Of course if it ever went before the courts .
The burden of proof (beyond reasonable doubt) falls to the persons
laying the complaint (s) .

Read the example below and note that this was again started by Lucas
himself .
Purporting to say he is being stalked.

Posted in the spirit of clarification and the hope that this thread
ends here (at least in the cooking group)

"On Dec 16, 11:35 am, PeterL > wrote:
> Just got the heads up that someone in Chat is using my name.
>
> Seems one of the stalkers (chris lewis aka 'welshdog') was recently asking
> what chat was and how to get there.
>
> Just goes to show how pathetic these stalkers really are, and the lengths
> that they will go to.
>
> I don't do chat, and won't be in the future..... tried it quite a while
> back, but it's tooooo 'noisy'.
>
> So if anyone is going in there using my name, it's a stalker.
>
> --
> Peter Lucas
> Brisbane