On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:23:38 +1100, Welsh Dog wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:57:40 +0000 (UTC), Jeßus
> > wrote:
>>On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:35:16 +0000, PeterL wrote:
>
>>> Just got the heads up that someone in Chat is using my name.
>
>>> Seems one of the stalkers (chris lewis aka 'welshdog') was recently
>>> asking what chat was and how to get there.
>
>>> Just goes to show how pathetic these stalkers really are, and the
>>> lengths that they will go to.
>
>>> I don't do chat, and won't be in the future..... tried it quite a
>>> while back, but it's tooooo 'noisy'.
>
>>> So if anyone is going in there using my name, it's a stalker.
>
>>Why don't you mind your own goddamned business for once lucas? You get
>>NO say on who wants to chat to whom - or anything else for that matter.
>>Not every person is out to get you, you paranoid freak.
>
> Thanks for pointing me towards this thread - I'm astounded by his
> claims, and if he's developed the notion that *I* am stalking *him* then
> he's really slipping.

I'm surprised that you're surprised
You know what he's like...

In recent weeks he's been accusing you, me, pits and BK of a number of
'crimes' here (one at a time) - then without any apparent reason he'll
switch the blame, i.e blamed you for the chat 'crime', then suddenly it
was BK behind it.

> There's no way I'll forget his behaviour in ozdebate (and elsewhere) and
> 'paranoid' comes nowhere near close enough. When I say he needs therapy
> I'm expressing a professional opinion.

It's plainly obvious, after all. Earlier this year he was following me
around groups he's never used previously, all to assure me that I was
doomed, would be in a coma... etc etc.

Then he wanted to meet me yet again so he could "beat me into a bloody
pulp". I gave him all the info he needed (including photos of my then
current abode) and then heard nothing more from him for a few months.
This was mainly in aus.cars.

> He is quite seriously in need of urgent psychiatric assistance!!
>
> I see he's even started making those 'veiled threats' of his to innocent
> people in here. Soon enough he'll do what he's done on every other
> groups he's belonged to and try to wreck in.

Yep, it'll happen. Its just a question of how long it'll take.

> Hopefully RFC will be big enough to resist him by blanketing his 'fires
> out (by the sheer number of posts in here) before they take hold.

Yep, the groups is resilient enough to survive this little saga