TFM® > wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> notbob wrote:
>>> On 2008-11-14, Sqwertz > wrote:
>>>
>>>> They should have put a pig face on it, it being 80% pig meat.
>>>
>>> Kinda make ya wonder what the other 20% is. Couldn't be 20%
>>> preservatives
>>> and coloring.
>>
>> Parts of the pig that can't be labeled as "pork", mechanically separated
>> chicken, water, salt, sugar, spices, preservatives.
>
> One would hope mechanically separated chicken couldn't be labeled as pork.
> Maybe it's just me.

Who said it was labeled as pork, ****face? It says it's 80% pork,
and that's all.

> Proofreading is your friend.

And sticking your head up your ass might do you well.

-sw