On Wed 12 Nov 2008 09:26:37a, Nancy2 told us...

> On Nov 12, 9:44*am, "Nancy Young" > wrote:
>> Mr. Bill wrote:
>> > And we wonder why GM is broke..now they want YOU & ME, *the lowly
>> > taxpayer, to bail them out!!
>> > GM Spends $17 Million Per Year on Viagra
>>
>> Wonder if they cover birth *control* pills, which would seem
>> a wiser investment as having babies is not cheap for the
>> insurance company.
>>
>> nancy
>
> Here's the odd thing - along with Viagra, most companies cover in
> vitro fertilization treatments. I really resent that. As far as I'm
> concerned, "needing" Viagra is an ego thing, and in vitro (or other
> medical treatments for infertility) seems on a par with cosmetic
> surgery.

IMHO, if couples were meant to have children, then they would be able to
have them without the intervention of “rocket science”. If you were a man,
you might not consider Viagra an ego thing. Impotence is a serious
condition that goes beyond ego. Impotence absolutely prevents the sexual
act for a male, while females are not so afflicted. Having said that, I’m
not suggesting that insurance should cover any of it.

--
Wayne Boatwright
(correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply)

************************************************** **********************
Date: Wednesday, 11(XI)/12(XII)/08(MMVIII)
************************************************** **********************
Countdown till U.S. Thanksgiving Day
2wks 5hrs 28mins
************************************************** **********************
All Wood? Oh! AL Wood. I didn't see the missing 'L' at first.
************************************************** **********************