On Nov 12, 11:26*am, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> Kathleen wrote:
> > Nancy2 wrote:
>
> >> On Nov 12, 9:44 am, "Nancy Young" > wrote:
>
> >>> Mr. Bill wrote:
>
> >>>> And we wonder why GM is broke..now they want YOU & ME, *the lowly
> >>>> taxpayer, to bail them out!!
> >>>> GM Spends $17 Million Per Year on Viagra
>
> >>> Wonder if they cover birth *control* pills, which would seem
> >>> a wiser investment as having babies is not cheap for the
> >>> insurance company.
>
> >>> nancy
>
> >> Here's the odd thing - along with Viagra, most companies cover in
> >> vitro fertilization treatments. *I really resent that. As far as I'm
> >> concerned, "needing" Viagra is an ego thing, and in vitro (or other
> >> medical treatments for infertility) seems on a par with cosmetic
> >> surgery.
>
> > Really? *You equate a nose job with getting pregnant?
>
> I wouldn't equate it but let's face it, guys, at some point in life you
> simply lose the ability to get a hard dick. *Viagra is definitely an ego
> thing. *Most of us women just wish you'd keep it in your pants after age 70.
>
> Jill- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Too funny. ;-)

N.