On Nov 12, 11:12*am, Omelet > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Nancy2 > wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 9:44*am, "Nancy Young" > wrote:
> > > Mr. Bill wrote:
> > > > And we wonder why GM is broke..now they want YOU & ME, *the lowly
> > > > taxpayer, to bail them out!!
> > > > GM Spends $17 Million Per Year on Viagra
>
> > > Wonder if they cover birth *control* pills, which would seem
> > > a wiser investment as having babies is not cheap for the
> > > insurance company.
>
> > > nancy
>
> > Here's the odd thing - along with Viagra, most companies cover in
> > vitro fertilization treatments. *I really resent that. As far as I'm
> > concerned, "needing" Viagra is an ego thing, and in vitro (or other
> > medical treatments for infertility) seems on a par with cosmetic
> > surgery.
>
> Childless couples would not agree with that... * Sorry.
> --
> Peace! Om
>
> "Our prime purpose in this life is to help others. And if you can't help them, at least don't hurt them." -- Dalai Lama- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

There are other options for childless couples. Infertility is not
"ill health," especially since pregnancy is not considered "ill
health."

N.