In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:09:27 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > blake murphy > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:45:58 -0500, Omelet wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article 7>,
> >>> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm not insinuating anything. I'm *stating* that welfare *abusers*
> >>>> (abusers for any reason) should have either severely limited or no
> >>>> benefits
> >>>> at all.
> >>>
> >>> Welfare ABUSERS are the problem and the issue.
> >>>
> >>> I'll say again, I have no problem with helping people that need help!
> >>> It's those that go out of their way to earn a free living that are the
> >>> entire problem!
> >>
> >> and what percentage of the awful, awful one percent of your taxes do they
> >> absorb?
> >>
> >> christ, you begrudge these people the crumbs off your table. how
> >> compassionate.
> >>
> >> blake
> >
> > You have no clu' Blake. A good 10% of my NET income right now goes out
> > to both family members and a good friend that needs the money. I could
> > do the work I pay her to do for me, but her PRIDE makes her want to work
> > for what she gets.
> >
> > She never outright asked me for money. She asked if I had any work she
> > could help me with.
>
> but people not in your family or your circle of friends don't deserve
> consideration.
>
> blake

If I give away ALL of my income Blake, what am _I_ supposed to live on?

I have bills and needs too.

And I'm no technophile.
--
Peace! Om

"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed." --Mark Twain