In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:45:58 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
> > In article 7>,
> > Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not insinuating anything. I'm *stating* that welfare *abusers*
> >> (abusers for any reason) should have either severely limited or no
> >> benefits
> >> at all.
> >
> > Welfare ABUSERS are the problem and the issue.
> >
> > I'll say again, I have no problem with helping people that need help!
> > It's those that go out of their way to earn a free living that are the
> > entire problem!
>
> and what percentage of the awful, awful one percent of your taxes do they
> absorb?
>
> christ, you begrudge these people the crumbs off your table. how
> compassionate.
>
> blake

You have no clu' Blake. A good 10% of my NET income right now goes out
to both family members and a good friend that needs the money. I could
do the work I pay her to do for me, but her PRIDE makes her want to work
for what she gets.

She never outright asked me for money. She asked if I had any work she
could help me with.
--
Peace! Om

"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed." --Mark Twain