"Dutch" > wrote in message
...
>
> > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:29:24 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >
> > > wrote
> > >
> > >> >> But I am opposed to the battery method
> > >> >> of keeping chickens,
> > >> >
> > >> >No, you aren't, ****wit: you eat eggs and other
> > >> >products coming from such chickens. Therefore, you
> > >> >SUPPORT battery methods. Stop lying.
> > >>
> > >> I'm not opposed to eating eggs, just that method of
> > >> raising the chickens. How much difference do you think
> > >> it would make if I quit consuming products which contain
> > >> battery raised eggs Gonad? Regardless of what you think
> > >> I don't believe it would make any difference at all, and
> > >> there is no way you can convince me that it would.
> > >
> > >Cop-out, of course it would make a difference. The proof is easily
seen,
> if
> > >a million people did the same
> >
> > As ALWAYS your comparisons are nothing similar to reality.
>
> Are you saying that there are not a million consumers of battery eggs?
>
> > >it would make a huge difference, and clearly
> > >"no difference at all" times a million is still no difference.
> >
> > How stupid. So when I die, how will it influence chicken
> > or egg production?
>
> It will decrease by an amount exactly proportional to your consumption.
>
> Do you use the same cop-out logic to avoid bothering to vote in elections,
> because your vote won't change anything?

Cop-out logic? Isn't it the same logic used by you
when you wrote the following line in another discussion?

"..I didn't confront the idea of collateral deaths though. When I
finally did I realized what a paltry partial-measure thing veganism
is ..."