"C. James Strutz" > wrote in message
...
>
> "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> ...
> > C. James Strutz wrote:
> > >>>But you started a thread about a movie that's
> > >>>totally unrelated to vegan issues.
> > >>
> > >>No, look again at the subject. It's still about copyrights.
> > >
> > > I did look at the subject. It still has nothing to do with vegan
> > > issues.
> >
> > It does when "ethical" vegans and other leftwingers (like you)
> repeatedly
> > violate copyrights.
>
> I'm not left-wing at all. Then again, Newt Gingrich is liberal
> compared to you.
>
> > >>>Additionally, you imposed your
> > >>>political bent
> > >>
> > >>I didn't impose anything. I merely revealed my contempt for fat
> > > slobs who
> > >>document their lies and call it "art."
> > >
> > > What exactly did he lie about in the movie?
> >
> > One of the central lies is that President Bush personally arranged
> for the
> > Binladen family to leave the US following September 11th (along with
> a litany of
> > other crackpot conspiracy charges which General Wes Clark was asked
> if he agreed
> > with when Moore endorsed his campaign). The person who authorized
> the departure
> > of the Binladens and other Saudis was Richard Clarke.
> >
> >
> http://jskelly.squarespace.com/displ...moduleId=15843
> &entryId=13586
>
> This is a very conservative website. It's hardly a credible source
> from which to make a legitimate case.
>
> > Would you like me to find the other lies and distortions in Moore's
> tawdry movie?
>
> Knock yourself out. Just use credible sources if you want anyone to
> take you seriously.
>
> > > Have you seen it?
> >
> > Not yet, but I have plenty friends who have. Not one, even among my
> liberal
> > friends, was impressed.
>
> You have friends?! Liberal friends even!
>
> > >>>by referring to Michael Moore as "lard ass
> > >>>propagandist".
> > >>
> > >>All three words apply to him.
> > >
> > > One could say the same about Rush Limbaugh.
> >
> > Maybe you were unaware that Mr Limbaugh has lost well over 100
> pounds. One
> > glaring difference between Limbaugh and Moore is that Limbaugh
> doesn't lie to
> > score points; that's the only way Moore can. Still, I'm not an
> apologist for
> > Rush Limbaugh.
>
> My point in this was your words "lard ass propagandist" could describe
> some conservatives (Rush was my example) as well as some liberals. The
> only reason you railed Moore was because he doesn't share your
> political opinion. Therefore you are inconsistent and biased.
>
> > > You are inconsistent and biased.
> >
> > Non sequitur; you haven't shown any bias or inconsistency on my
> part.
>
> Wrong, see above. You believe only what the conservative propaganda
> machine says you should believe. You are a biased, inconsistent
> parrot.
>
> > Contrary
> > to what you seem to think, I don't listen to Rush. I'm more a fan of
> Sean
> > Hannity, Michael Reagan, G Gordon Liddy, Oliver North, Michael
> Medved, and,
> > sometimes, Michael Savage.
>
> Rush isn't all that bad a guy after all. He's a Pittsburgh Steeler
> fan! :^)
and he uses opiates to relax-of course being a Steeler fan at this time-they
both go together.


>
>