"usual suspect" > wrote in message
...
> C. James Strutz wrote:
> >>>But you started a thread about a movie that's
> >>>totally unrelated to vegan issues.
> >>
> >>No, look again at the subject. It's still about copyrights.
> >
> > I did look at the subject. It still has nothing to do with vegan
> > issues.
>
> It does when "ethical" vegans and other leftwingers (like you)
repeatedly
> violate copyrights.

I'm not left-wing at all. Then again, Newt Gingrich is liberal
compared to you.

> >>>Additionally, you imposed your
> >>>political bent
> >>
> >>I didn't impose anything. I merely revealed my contempt for fat
> > slobs who
> >>document their lies and call it "art."
> >
> > What exactly did he lie about in the movie?
>
> One of the central lies is that President Bush personally arranged
for the
> Binladen family to leave the US following September 11th (along with
a litany of
> other crackpot conspiracy charges which General Wes Clark was asked
if he agreed
> with when Moore endorsed his campaign). The person who authorized
the departure
> of the Binladens and other Saudis was Richard Clarke.
>
>
http://jskelly.squarespace.com/displ...moduleId=15843
&entryId=13586

This is a very conservative website. It's hardly a credible source
from which to make a legitimate case.

> Would you like me to find the other lies and distortions in Moore's
tawdry movie?

Knock yourself out. Just use credible sources if you want anyone to
take you seriously.

> > Have you seen it?
>
> Not yet, but I have plenty friends who have. Not one, even among my
liberal
> friends, was impressed.

You have friends?! Liberal friends even!

> >>>by referring to Michael Moore as "lard ass
> >>>propagandist".
> >>
> >>All three words apply to him.
> >
> > One could say the same about Rush Limbaugh.
>
> Maybe you were unaware that Mr Limbaugh has lost well over 100
pounds. One
> glaring difference between Limbaugh and Moore is that Limbaugh
doesn't lie to
> score points; that's the only way Moore can. Still, I'm not an
apologist for
> Rush Limbaugh.

My point in this was your words "lard ass propagandist" could describe
some conservatives (Rush was my example) as well as some liberals. The
only reason you railed Moore was because he doesn't share your
political opinion. Therefore you are inconsistent and biased.

> > You are inconsistent and biased.
>
> Non sequitur; you haven't shown any bias or inconsistency on my
part.

Wrong, see above. You believe only what the conservative propaganda
machine says you should believe. You are a biased, inconsistent
parrot.

> Contrary
> to what you seem to think, I don't listen to Rush. I'm more a fan of
Sean
> Hannity, Michael Reagan, G Gordon Liddy, Oliver North, Michael
Medved, and,
> sometimes, Michael Savage.

Rush isn't all that bad a guy after all. He's a Pittsburgh Steeler
fan! :^)