C. James Putz wrote:
>>>But you started a thread about a movie that's
>>>totally unrelated to vegan issues.
>>
>>No, look again at the subject. It's still about copyrights.
>
> I did look at the subject. It still has nothing to do with vegan
> issues.

It does when "ethical" vegans and other leftwingers (like you) repeatedly
violate copyrights.

>>>Additionally, you imposed your
>>>political bent
>>
>>I didn't impose anything. I merely revealed my contempt for fat
> slobs who
>>document their lies and call it "art."
>
> What exactly did he lie about in the movie?

One of the central lies is that President Bush personally arranged for the
Binladen family to leave the US following September 11th (along with a litany of
other crackpot conspiracy charges which General Wes Clark was asked if he agreed
with when Moore endorsed his campaign). The person who authorized the departure
of the Binladens and other Saudis was Richard Clarke.

http://jskelly.squarespace.com/displ...&entryId=13586

Would you like me to find the other lies and distortions in Moore's tawdry movie?

> Have you seen it?

Not yet, but I have plenty friends who have. Not one, even among my liberal
friends, was impressed.

>>>by referring to Michael Moore as "lard ass
>>>propagandist".
>>
>>All three words apply to him.
>
> One could say the same about Rush Limbaugh.

Maybe you were unaware that Mr Limbaugh has lost well over 100 pounds. One
glaring difference between Limbaugh and Moore is that Limbaugh doesn't lie to
score points; that's the only way Moore can. Still, I'm not an apologist for
Rush Limbaugh.

> You are inconsistent and biased.

Non sequitur; you haven't shown any bias or inconsistency on my part. Contrary
to what you seem to think, I don't listen to Rush. I'm more a fan of Sean
Hannity, Michael Reagan, G Gordon Liddy, Oliver North, Michael Medved, and,
sometimes, Michael Savage.

<...>